6 Times I Can’t Believe He Stayed With Me

When I Debuted the Getup That I Really Wear Around the House

For the first few months I was dating my now-husband, Tom, I?d wear normal civilian outfits when he came to my apartment, like pants and a clean shirt. Then one Saturday, I couldn?t maintain the charade any longer, and swung open the door, clad in the outfit I actually wear around the house: a mangy black sweater that resembles a deflated Muppet; ancient, saggy black sweats spangled with bleach stains; and something called Socks to Stay Home In, a gift from my mother, which are just as sexy as they sound.

?Hi,? Tom said uncertainly, hesitating at the door. A very formal dresser, he does not own a pair of sweatpants. ?Is this…is this a bad time??

?Nope,? I said cheerfully. I reasoned it was, in fact, a good time for him to know precisely what he was in for.

I should say that when he cautiously?and symbolically?stepped through the door of my apartment, this was not even the time I can?t believe he stayed with me. It was during his next visit, when he saw with dismay that I was wearing the same outfit. It was then that he knew: My Recently Discharged look wasn?t going away. Ever.

When It Dawned on Him That He Was Going to Be My Retired Parents? IT Guy for Life

If we visit my parents in New Jersey, Tom barely has his coat off before my father is asking to ?borrow him for a quick second.? Then, he is pulled into my parents? den to tinker with their various accounts, and tackle issues such as ?Why does that darn ad follow me around on Facebook?? And, ?Why do I have to listen to different artists on Spotify when I only want to hear Josh Groban??

Recently, my parents have begun to phone Tom at home with additional queries. ?It?s my dad,? I whispered one Saturday, handing him the receiver. ?He just has a quick question.? That was the moment that grim comprehension flickered across Tom?s face, as he realized that, because technology is always changing, he would be receiving these calls for as long as my parents remain on earth. Furthermore, with my parents, there is no such thing as a ?quick question.? Instead, it typically goes like this:

Dad: Did you get my email? I think the photos we send from our phone are blurry. Is the photo I attached blurry?

Tom: I don?t see anything.

Dad: Well, it takes awhile to show up. I sent it about 15 minutes ago to your AOL account.

Tom: I closed that account three years ago.

Dad: All righty, I just sent it to Gmail. I think! Do you see it?

Tom: I?m afraid I don?t.

Dad: How about now? No? Well, then, I?ll call back in 15 minutes.

Tom: But, Jay, that mail should show up pretty much instantly. It?s not the Pony Express. See, it?s?

Dad: Talk to you soon! (click)

When He Witnessed My Worst Meltdown Ever

A few months after the arrival of our new baby, I asked Tom to do the dishes after I had made what I felt was a very nice dinner of spaghetti Bolognese.

?Later,? he said, plopping on the couch and pulling out his phone. ?Let?s just let them soak.?

Well. The phrase ?let them soak? just unhinged something deep inside of me. Granted, at the time, I was deranged from hormonal changes and sleep deprivation, but I was suddenly filled with rage. Tom said later that in 10 years of marriage, he had never seen my face turn that particular shade of purple.

I can?t remember exactly what I yelled, but the expletive-laden gist of it went something like this: ?For women, there is no ?later?! You men treat everything like it?s an option! When you put things off, the pile of crap I have to do just gets bigger!?

I do recall yelling incoherently at the end of my tirade, ?You just want to let the whole world soak! Women can?t…can?t not let it soak!? Then, I collapsed into hysterical sobs. At which point he gently led me to bed, and then quietly did the dishes.

When He Saw Me Dance for the First Time

Oh, my. Not good.

When My New Mom Friends Descended on Our House

As our daughter grew, I fell into a raucous group of mom friends. One day, I told Tom I was going to host a playdate at our apartment, and he nodded absently.

However, he snapped to attention as the moms and kids piled into our house. He quickly discerned that after the kids were stashed in my daughter?s bedroom, it was the moms who planned on doing most of the playing. These gals were wiping noses all day, and they were ready to get loose! It was like having the suburban versions of Melissa McCarthy and Leslie Jones in your living room.

Tom had never seen this side of his wife. He tried hiding out in our bedroom, but in our small apartment, you can still hear everything. They?no, I have to own it, we?rooted through the fridge to unearth the craft beer Tom had stashed in the back. We made vulgar jokes about how Bruce Springsteen may be 67, but we?d ?definitely hit that.? We had loud and incredibly detailed conversations about hair removal.

After a few hours, Tom was visibly twitching and sent me pointed looks when he emerged from the bedroom that said, ?When the hell are they going??

He brightened when my friends called to their kids playing in the bedroom, ?Five more minutes, okay? Seriously. I mean it.?

Then, they found the Pinot.

When I Revealed the Full Extent of My Germophobia, Neat Freakiness and Recycling Mania

One afternoon, Tom looked on with alarm as I jammed a perfectly good pillow into the trash.

He asked what I was doing. I told him I had just read an article that pillows are filled with dead dust mites, which sent me to a bad place. The queasy expression on his face clearly read, ?Is this going to be a problem??

I?m afraid it is. If Tom wants to let the whole world soak, I want to declutter, straighten and sterilize the whole world. I?m the sort of carefree, fun person who buys hospital-grade alcohol wipes called Sani-Hands in bulk, even as the rational corner of my brain knows that my puny attempts to rid my environment of microbes are ultimately futile. The moment Tom puts down an empty can of seltzer or a section of the newspaper, I race over and whisk it into to the recycling bin. My idea of a good time is to fussily arrange my closet, folding sweaters with Gap precision.

Yet happily, despite this foible and many others that continue to be revealed, my husband has made the decision, over and over again, to stay. We all know it?s important to actively look for the good in relationships, but I think it?s just as crucial to be willfully oblivious. As Ben Franklin wrote in Poor Richard?s Almanack, ?Keep your eyes wide open before marriage, and half shut afterwards.?

Jancee Dunn is the author of How Not to Hate Your Husband After Kids, the novel Don?t You Forget About Me and the memoir But Enough About Me.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Stephen Colbert Rips Into Donald Trump’s ‘Brutal’ Budget That Targets His Own Voters

?Late Show? host Stephen Colbert took aim at President Donald Trump?s 2018 budget plan on Tuesday.

With the budget proposal outlining a $3.6 trillion reduction in government spending over the next 10 years, Colbert said the cuts set out in the document titled ?A New Foundation For American Greatness? would hit Trump?s own voters the hardest.

?That foundation of America?s greatness, what?s he building that on?? Colbert asked. ?It turns out he?s building that foundation out of the ground-up bones of poor people, because this budget cuts things like the food stamp program SNAP and the children?s health insurance program CHIP.?

?So he?s cutting SNAP and CHIP, to which America?s children replied, ?STOP!? and ?HELP!?? Colbert added. ?I know this is an unpopular position these days, but I believe children should go to the doctor and eat.?

Check out the full segment above.

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related Coverage articlesList=5923f602e4b094cdba5724f0,590d9366e4b0d5d9049ccbc9,5743f676e4b00e09e89fe561,591e9325e4b094cdba52df46

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Trump Isn’t Draining The Swamp. He’s Hiding It.

WASHINGTON ? President Donald Trump promised during his campaign to ?drain the swamp? in Washington by cracking down on lobbyists who move into government jobs and back again. But now Trump?s White House has sought to block the government?s top ethics official from getting certain information about ex-lobbyists working in his administration. That means the public doesn?t know if all staffers are abiding by Trump?s own ethics pledge ? or whether they?re working to enrich their previous clients.

Trump signed an executive order in January banning executive branch appointees from working on a ?particular matter? they lobbied on within the two previous years. The ban lasts for two years from the employee?s appointment. The order also banned executive appointees from lobbying the agencies where they worked for five years after they leave office. But the Trump administration has broad power to grant exceptions, called waivers, to this rule, and Trump?s team is trying to keep them secret.

The lobbying pledge may have led people to believe Trump was draining the swamp. But Trump doesn?t seem to be doing that, a group of Democratic senators wrote to the president on April 20: ?It appears you have undermined [the order] by freely and secretly issuing waivers to allow former lobbyists to work on matters that could benefit their former clients.?

The Obama administration also granted waivers. But former President Barack Obama?s team made the reasoning for those waivers public. Trump hasn?t done that yet. On April 28, the Office of Government Ethics directed officials to release names of government appointees covered by waivers. Instead, Mick Mulvaney, director of the Office of Management and Budget, last week questioned OGE?s legal authority to request the information, and sought to stay the inquiry. This action drew a lengthy response from OGE Director Walter Shaub on Monday night, who said the ethics office would not back down.

Shaub gave agencies a June 1 deadline to comply with the directive. Some agencies appear to have responded, but the White House sought to stop disclosure across the whole government, according to the New York Times. (A White House spokesperson did not immediately respond to a HuffPost request for comment.)

The public is already feeling potential consequences. Senior White House budget adviser Marcus Peacock was granted a waiver to the five-year ban, and was only recusing himself from lobbying the Office of Management and Budget for six months, Bloomberg reported last month.

Michael Catanzaro, a former industry lobbyist, faced potential conflicts as a White House energy adviser, as did Shahira Knight, a former lobbyist for Fidelity, with her work on the National Economic Council, according to a New York Times and ProPublica report from April. The White House did not say whether they were granted waivers.

At HHS, White House liaison Timothy Clark ran a political consulting firm whose prior clients included the pharmaceutical industry group PhRMA, according to a ProPublica report from March. Similarly, HHS Secretary Tom Price?s chief of staff Lance Leggitt was registered as a lobbyist for 10 different companies or organizations involved in the health care industry as recently as the final three months of 2016.

Chad Wolf, now chief of staff at the Transportation Security Administration, was working as a lobbyist for Analogic Corporation, a company marketing airport security devices, through the end of 2016. Wolf?s law firm amended its final filing of 2016 to remove him as a lobbyist on Jan. 19 ? one day before Trump?s inauguration.

Byron Anderson was a lobbyist for the insurance holding company TransAmerica as recently as the end of 2016 before moving into the Department of Labor. At TransAmerica, Anderson lobbied to stop the Obama-era Department of Labor?s fiduciary conflict of interest rules for investors.

On Tuesday, Democratic senators sent a letter to OMB?s Mulvaney, urging him to withdraw his request for a stay or provide legal justification by May 25. They also said that if OMB does not stand down, they would attempt to seek the waivers themselves.

The secrecy ?suggests that they [the White House] view ethics as a source of potential embarrassment more than a policy goal,? John Wonderlich, executive director of the pro-transparency Sunlight Foundation, told HuffPost.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.